News

Leaked Flock Safety Guide Reveals Strategy to Turn Police Into Tech Advocates

A leaked internal guide from Flock Safety, a company that provides license plate readers and other surveillance technology to law enforcement agencies, has exposed what critics describe as a coordinated effort to use police departments as advocates for company interests before elected officials.

The document outlines how Flock Safety instructs and encourages law enforcement agencies to promote the company's technology to local leaders and decision-makers. According to the leaked materials, the strategy involves positioning police departments as intermediaries who can influence policy decisions in ways that benefit the company's commercial interests.

Flock Safety's technology includes automated license plate readers (ALPRs) that can scan and catalog large volumes of vehicle data. These systems have been deployed across numerous municipalities, raising ongoing debates about privacy implications and surveillance scope.

The leaked guide suggests that the company equips law enforcement agencies with talking points and frameworks designed to persuade elected officials to support expanded deployment of its technology. Critics argue this approach blurs the line between legitimate public safety partnerships and corporate lobbying operations, potentially influencing how taxpayer-funded surveillance infrastructure gets shaped without transparent public input.

Privacy advocates have long raised concerns about the expansion of license plate reader networks, noting that the data collected can reveal detailed information about individuals' movements, associations, and habits. The revelation of a coordinated corporate strategy to expand these systems through law enforcement relationships adds another layer to those concerns about accountability and democratic oversight of surveillance technologies.

The implications of such guidance suggest that decisions about surveillance infrastructure in communities may be influenced by corporate strategies rather than purely by public safety considerations and community input.

Sources